Text Links:

Home

Lesson Plans

Humor

Teacher Inquiry

Urban Education

Web Wizardry

Links

All material is my personal opinion, and not that of any other organization. Copyright 2001. Permission is granted for individual teacher use. All rights reserved.

Feedback is invited: Email me!

REFERENCES

American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Atwater, M., & Baptiste, P. (1993). Macmillan/McGraw Hill Science, Changes in Matter; Teacher's Planning Guide. Macmillan/McGraw Hill.

Brooks, Norman (NormanB495@aol.com). (Nov. 6, 1997) Re: Update on work with kits. Email to Anthony Cody (codypren@ousd.k12.ca.us)

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1991). Narrative Inquiry: Storied Experience, in Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. In Short, E. New York: State University of New York Press.(pp. 121- 153)

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The Right to Learn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Davis, N. T. (1996). Looking in the Mirror: Teachers' Use of Autobiography and Action Research to Improve Practice. Research in Science Education, 26 (1), 23 - 32.

Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people's children. Harvard Educational Review, 58 (3), 280 - 298.

Driver, R. (1983). The Pupil as Scientist? Philadelphia: Open University Press.

The Construction of Scientific Knowledge in School Classrooms. In Millar, R.(pp. 83 - 106). New York: Falmer Press.

Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Woood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making Sense of Secondary Science: Research into Children's Ideas. New York: Routledge.

Freire, P. (1992). Pedagogy of Hope. New York: Continuum.

Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or Praxis. London: Falmer Press.

Harlen, W. (1996). The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools, Second Ed. London: David Fulton.

Hollingsworth, S., Cody, A., Davis-Smallwood, J., Dybdahl, M., Gallagher, P., Gallego, M., Maestre, T., Minarik, L., Raffel, L., Standerford, N. S., & Teel, K. M. (1994). Teacher Research and Urban Literacy Education: Lessons and Conversations in a Feminist Key. New York: Teachers College Press.

hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to Transgress, Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.

Hopkins, D. (1993). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Research, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Layman, J. W., Ochoa, G., & Heikkenin, H. (1996). Inquiry and Learning; Realizing Science Standards in the Classroom. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

Lorsbach, A., & Tobin, K. (1992). Constructivism as a Referent for Science Teaching. Research Matters to the Science Teacher, Monograph #5.

Lytle, S. L., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1994). Inquiry Knowledge and Practice; in Teacher Research and Education Reform. Hollingsworth, S., & Sockett, H., eds. National Society for the Study of Education.

Marek, E. A., & Cavallo, A. M. L. (1997). The Learning Cycle. Heinemann.

Meek, A. (March, 1991). On Thinking about Teaching: A Conversation with Eleanor Duckworth. Educational Leadership, 30-34.

Mestre, J. P., & Lochhead, J. (1990). Academic Preparation In Science, 2nd Ed. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.

National Academy of Science. (1996). National Science Education Standards.Washington , D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Science Resource Center. (1997). Science for All Children. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Nugent, J. S., & Yerrick, D. R. (1995). (Re)Forming a Community: Understanding Change and Resistance in the Appropriation of Scientific Discourse.

O'Loughlin, M. (1992). Rethinking Science Education: Beyond Piagetian Constructivism:. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, # 8, 791 - 820.

Phillips, D. C. (October, 1995). The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24, #7, 5 - 12.

Saul, W., Reardon, J., Schmidt, A., Pearce, C., Blackwood, D., & Bird, M. D. (1993). Science Workshop; A Whole Language Approach. Portsmouth, New Hampshire: Heinemann.

Saul, W., Reardon, J. (Ed.). (1996). Beyond the Science Kit, Inquiry in Action. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Schon, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. [Online] Available: http://educ.queensu.ca/projects/action_research/schon87.htm [1998, March 26]

Sirotnik, K. A. Critical Inquiry: A Paradigm for Praxis, in Development and Dilemmas in Science Education. Fensham, P., ed. New York: Falmer Press.

Sund, R. B., & Trowbridge, L. W. (1967). Teaching Science by Inquiry. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill.

Tobin, K. (Nov. 1990). Social constructivist perspectives on the reform of science education. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 36,#4, 29-35.

Vaidya, N. (1970). Some Aspects of Piaget's Work and Science Teaching. New Delhi: S. Chand and Co.

Von Glaserfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, Contruction of Knowledge and Teaching. Synthese, 80, 121-140.

Return to Table of Contents

 

small buttonOakland Unified School District